Infrared, radio and Wi-Fi are three different range problems
An infrared remote sends pulses of invisible light. That makes it cheap and reliable and also gives it two hard constraints: it needs an unobstructed path to the receiver window, and it fades with distance in the way any light source does. Every "I have to stand up and point it" complaint traces back to that.
A Roku voice remote is the other case. Roku says some voice remotes connect using wireless signals rather than infrared, so you do not have to point them directly at the device — which is why they still work with the player hidden behind the panel. Roku publishes no distance figure for either type, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere with suspicion; what is documented is the presence or absence of the line-of-sight requirement, not a range in metres.
Driving the Roku from your phone changes the question again. The command travels from the phone to the router and from the router to the Roku, so the reach of the remote becomes the reach of your Wi-Fi. In most homes that is dramatically further than either hardware remote, and it passes through walls without complaint.